Skip to main content

firewall - ftp tls firewalled :(



My FTP(s) isn't working when my firewall is enabled. I have always had my iptables set up for me in the past, I learnt roughly how to set one up yesterday, but I've missed a rule that this requires. Here is my iptables.rules



# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.4 on Tue Nov 16 23:23:50 2010
*filter
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]

:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]

-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state -i eth0 --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 20:21 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 989:990 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 --dport 443 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 --dport 10000 -j ACCEPT

-A INPUT -p icmp -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable


COMMIT
# Completed on Tue Nov 16 23:23:50 2010
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.4 on Tue Nov 16 23:23:50 2010
*mangle
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [95811:65665815]
:INPUT ACCEPT [92355:65212126]

:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [55795:22371752]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [55795:22371752]
COMMIT
# Completed on Tue Nov 16 23:23:50 2010
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.4 on Tue Nov 16 23:23:50 2010
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [5132:543438]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [953:67517]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [953:67517]

COMMIT
# Completed on Tue Nov 16 23:23:50 2010


So just to summarize, my FTP will connect but not show any files with the firewall enabled. with firewall disabled, everything is perfect.



EDIT: the only otherway I have got this to work with the firewall is disabling ipv6, disabling TLS and adding a rule to the firewall which allows connection from my home network (server is elsewhere)


Answer



In Passive mode, when the client wants to get a file from the server or send a file to the server, the FTP server will pick a random port and send that port to the FTP client.



When you're not using encryption, a properly configured firewall (using the ip_conntrack_ftp helper kernel module, which may be what you're missing for non-TLS connections) would "listen in" on the connection and mark these connections as RELATED. With encryption the firewall can't listen in.




The quick and dirty solution to this is to configure the FTP server to choose a small range of ports for passive connections, and then allow access to all of these ports. For instance, in vsftpd:



pasv_min_port=12000
pasv_max_port=12049


Then in iptables:



iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 --dport 12000:12049 -j ACCEPT



Allowing anyone to access these ports opens one possible exploit: if someone were to be scanning them over and over they might get lucky and be able to "beat" the real user to the data port and grab the file. Ideally your FTP server would check and make sure the connection is coming from the same place as the original connection, but thanks to things like "FXP" (transferring files from one server to another server by convincing one to make an active connection to the other's passive data port) some servers don't check the connection by default. You should check your configuration file and see if there is an option to disable FXP, and use it. (vsftpd calls this "promiscuous" and is disabled by default.)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able