Apache memory usage optimization

Apache is using too much of my server memory causing it to crash. I have 4GB of RAM in the server.

I'm trying to fine tune Apache settings in order to improve it's performance but I'm quite new at this.

I was trying to follow this article's advice but I'm not sure how to calculate things and it seems I'm making it worse.

My top reads like:

11697 apache    15   0  322m  37m 4048 S  0.0  0.9   0:00.52 httpd
13602 apache    15   0  323m  37m 3944 S  0.0  0.9   0:00.50 httpd
11786 apache    15   0  322m  36m 4052 S  0.0  0.9   0:00.50 httpd
12525 apache    15   0  322m  36m 4040 S  0.0  0.9   0:00.63 httpd

11806 apache    15   0  322m  36m 3952 S  0.0  0.9   0:00.42 httpd
11731 apache    15   0  322m  36m 4036 S  0.0  0.9   0:00.46 httpd
11717 apache    16   0  322m  36m 3956 S  0.0  0.9   0:00.54 httpd
11659 apache    15   0  322m  36m 3980 S  0.0  0.9   0:00.49 httpd

So, it would be

MaxClients = 3000/ (322-37) = 10

Is that right? Also, what should be the values for the other parameters such as MinSpareServers, MaxSpareServers,MaxRequestsPerChild, StartServers, MinSpareThreads, MaxSpareThreads, ThreadsPerChild, MaxRequestsPerChild ?

Would someone please help me?

Update

I've tried what you guys have suggested. It works, but just for a while. After some time after the server is started memory usage keeps increasing and never goes down.

I mean, after I start the server, let's assume there'are 500 users online. Server will consume X RAM. 2 hours after that, with the same 500 users online, server will be consuming 10X RAM.

Is there a way to avoid this or I'll have to keep watching the server and restarting it from time to time?

Comments

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able

Blog

Search This Blog