Skip to main content

apache 2.2 - Best Practices for Webserver Benchmarking



I have a webserver that I wish to benchmark before I make some optimizations to it to see if they have any effect.



However, I want to know what are the best practices for benchmarking?




For example, a co-worker told me to benchmark the machine with another machine on a local network to eliminate network traffic problems.



However, I was thinking of using an off-site machine to benchmark because I wanted to see if the optimizations would make any difference in a real-world case.



I was arguing that many of the speed tweaks deal with optimizing network connection. For example, in Apache, the KeepAlive value allows browsers to use a single TCP connection to request multiple objects, instead of opening and closing a connection for each resource.



If the test was done on a local network connection, then that tweak wouldn't really make that much of a difference, right? The same with minimizing js/css and removing whitespace/comments from HTML.



On the other hand, I do see the problem with internet traffic making each time the benchmark run from being consistent. I wouldn't really know if the changes in the numbers are from the tweaks or if the servers in between had increased or decreased loads.




Who's right? What is the best practice for benchmarking? Should we do both?



tl;dr - Should I benchmark using a machine on the local network/off-site/or both?


Answer



This all depends very much about your site. Doing both off-line and on-site benchmarks won't hurt. But, what to tweak and how to test?



If you are mostly serving out static content or some very simple dynamic content and doing so at an insane rate, then tweaking things in Apache timeout / kernel-level makes sense.



If you have a dynamic site, then tweaking very soon becomes a different beast. Sure, making all those Apache and kernel level optimizations are still a sensible thing to do, but don't get fooled and smoke-mirrored by those.




When it comes to performance tweaking / testing, always first take care of the slowest parts. With a dynamic site the real bottleneck is most likely 1) the database or 2) the scripts your site is running.



If the slowest part is the database, it doesn't make sense to performance-tune your Apache before you can make your database fast. In addition to that you'll need to be sure you have proper caching techniques in place and you run memcached or similar if possible.



So, that was about what to benchmark and tweak. Now, how to benchmark?



I like to run two kinds of benchmarks. If the numbers are already known -- say, a site is getting a revamp, so you know unique visitors, page loads and similar statistics from the old site --, I run a realistic benchmark with rate similar to current web site. I also benchmark it with a similar rate * 2 to see if it can stand a little bit of future growth.



The other kind of benchmark I like to run is to smoke and burn the site. I'll just torture the hell out of it by running benchmark as fast as possible with insane amounts of simultaneous requests. If it can stand it, great, if it cannot, I find what's the breaking point.




Tools I like: ab, siege, JMeter.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able