Skip to main content

apache 2.2 - Best Practices for Webserver Benchmarking



I have a webserver that I wish to benchmark before I make some optimizations to it to see if they have any effect.



However, I want to know what are the best practices for benchmarking?




For example, a co-worker told me to benchmark the machine with another machine on a local network to eliminate network traffic problems.



However, I was thinking of using an off-site machine to benchmark because I wanted to see if the optimizations would make any difference in a real-world case.



I was arguing that many of the speed tweaks deal with optimizing network connection. For example, in Apache, the KeepAlive value allows browsers to use a single TCP connection to request multiple objects, instead of opening and closing a connection for each resource.



If the test was done on a local network connection, then that tweak wouldn't really make that much of a difference, right? The same with minimizing js/css and removing whitespace/comments from HTML.



On the other hand, I do see the problem with internet traffic making each time the benchmark run from being consistent. I wouldn't really know if the changes in the numbers are from the tweaks or if the servers in between had increased or decreased loads.




Who's right? What is the best practice for benchmarking? Should we do both?



tl;dr - Should I benchmark using a machine on the local network/off-site/or both?


Answer



This all depends very much about your site. Doing both off-line and on-site benchmarks won't hurt. But, what to tweak and how to test?



If you are mostly serving out static content or some very simple dynamic content and doing so at an insane rate, then tweaking things in Apache timeout / kernel-level makes sense.



If you have a dynamic site, then tweaking very soon becomes a different beast. Sure, making all those Apache and kernel level optimizations are still a sensible thing to do, but don't get fooled and smoke-mirrored by those.




When it comes to performance tweaking / testing, always first take care of the slowest parts. With a dynamic site the real bottleneck is most likely 1) the database or 2) the scripts your site is running.



If the slowest part is the database, it doesn't make sense to performance-tune your Apache before you can make your database fast. In addition to that you'll need to be sure you have proper caching techniques in place and you run memcached or similar if possible.



So, that was about what to benchmark and tweak. Now, how to benchmark?



I like to run two kinds of benchmarks. If the numbers are already known -- say, a site is getting a revamp, so you know unique visitors, page loads and similar statistics from the old site --, I run a realistic benchmark with rate similar to current web site. I also benchmark it with a similar rate * 2 to see if it can stand a little bit of future growth.



The other kind of benchmark I like to run is to smoke and burn the site. I'll just torture the hell out of it by running benchmark as fast as possible with insane amounts of simultaneous requests. If it can stand it, great, if it cannot, I find what's the breaking point.




Tools I like: ab, siege, JMeter.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

iLO 3 Firmware Update (HP Proliant DL380 G7)

The iLO web interface allows me to upload a .bin file ( Obtain the firmware image (.bin) file from the Online ROM Flash Component for HP Integrated Lights-Out. ) The iLO web interface redirects me to a page in the HP support website ( http://www.hp.com/go/iLO ) where I am supposed to find this .bin firmware, but no luck for me. The support website is a mess and very slow, badly categorized and generally unusable. Where can I find this .bin file? The only related link I am able to find asks me about my server operating system (what does this have to do with the iLO?!) and lets me download an .iso with no .bin file And also a related question: what is the latest iLO 3 version? (for Proliant DL380 G7, not sure if the iLO is tied to the server model)

linux - How can I get my mediawiki to stop thinking I have cookies disabled?

I've searched half a day for how to resolve this issue, and can't figure it out. Shortly after I made my wiki a simple private wiki according to the instructions at Mediawiki's website, it started giving me this weird login error message: Wiki uses cookies to log in users. You have cookies disabled. Please enable them and try again. If I remove those private wiki settings, the error disappears, even if I try logging in. But I need it to be a private wiki for only my team. So what do I do? Here's what I've done so far. Just to be safe, after ever change, I try rebooting Apache using: sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart In my php.ini file, I have the following set: session.save_path = "/var/lib/php5" session.cookie_secure = secure session.cookie_path = /tmp session.cookie_domain = my server's internal URL (should I even set this? this field was blank before, but not commented out) session.referer_check = Off I ran the following to ensure that the fold...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...