Skip to main content

amazon route53 - How to delegate DNS for sub-domain to domain with separate hosted zones



TL;DR: When the primary hosted zone contains two NS records, containing the name servers for the primary hosted zone (example.com) and the subdomain hosted zone (sub.example.com) would that be sufficient to get sub.domain.com resolved going over the nameserver of example.com?







Domains are currently managed by name.com but DNS should be managed by AWS Route 53 in order to automate creation of new sub-domains and set up records dynamically.



The domain ownership should stay with name.com which means a custom name server needs to be configured for the domain example.com



Subdomains like sub.example.com should be resolved through the name server of example.com as well, otherwise adding a new subdomain would require to configure a custom name server on name.com.



In the current setup, each domain and sub-domain is in its own hosted zone. example.com has a NS record and sub.example.com has one, too.
Now to delegate I have added another NS record in example.com for sub.example.com containing the name servers of sub.example.com




So two NS records in the hosted zone example.com. Yet when I run



dig @ns-of-example.com sub.example.com


I don't get an answer section, though authority section containing the right nameservers. I would have assumed dig does a recursion and then asks the authoritive nameservers listed there.



But I assume I have a flaw in my logic how the DNS protocol works here.


Answer





I don't get an answer section, though authority section containing the right nameservers.




Then you should be good. By default, dig only asks the server you told it to ask, and shows you the answer from that server.




I would have assumed dig does a recursion and then asks the authoritive nameservers listed there.




That's an incorrect assumption. If you want a recursive lookup that is a fully valid test of how the domain behaves on the Internet, you need to ask a public recursive resolver to do it for you, e.g. dig @8.8.8.8 my-sub.example.com.




Otherwise, you can get the behavior you want it you use dig ... +trace but be aware that there are circumstances where this can give you a false sense of success, because it's not doing a lookup using a recursive resolver -- which is how normal machines will do their lookups.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able