Skip to main content

Nameservers for Open SRS - who is accountable for my domain?





I purchased the "release" of a domain from a domain provider who was also hosting the corresponding website.



I was given an account to log-in to at opensrs.net.



I pointed the domain to different nameservers to allow me to host it myself.






Now, several months later, the client received a renewal domain notice from the original domain provider. They advised the client to ignore the notice because payment was good until 2014. Days later, the domain is suspended, the nameservers were changed to RENEWYOURNAME.NET and has now gone into redemption meaning it's unavailable for 40 days.



The original domain provider insists that they are no longer responsible for the domain.





Who is managing my domain? Who is payment due to? Who cancelled the account and changed the nameservers?




WHOIS data suggest that it's http://www.tucowsdomains.com/ who is a reseller of http://www.opensrs.com/.



Tuscow Domains clearly identify the original domain provider as the current provider. Open SRS, through their control panel identify the same. The original domain provider denies responsibility.


Answer




Who is managing my domain?




From the sounds of it, nobody. According to whois, Tucows Domains is the registrar? Then Tucows Domains is the only company with permission to change the nameservers to "renewyourname.net".




Tucows isn't a reseller of OpenSRS, they own it - OpenSRS is the domain wholesale reselling branch of Tucows. Other companies then deal with registering domains and selling them to people and businesses.



So, are you a reseller with OpenSRS? What kind of username and password do you have there? It sounds like the original company gave you an end user login to their reseller account to manage your domain. I.e. the domain is still belonging to their account.



I don't think OpenSRS sell to end users directly. So if you have a reseller account where you pay OpenSRS for some domains and the domain is not in it, they haven't transferred it to you properly. If you don't have a reseller account, you aren't in a position to take ownership of the domain anyway and they can't have transferred it to you.



I guess the original registrant was an OpenSRS reseller, and they haven't handed the domain over to you at all, and are still responsible for it even though they think they aren't, and that OpenSRS is waiting on payment from them to make the domain live again.



Your argument is either to convince them that they haven't transferred it to you. Or to get them to confirm with OpenSRS that they have and it hasn't worked.




http://www.tucowsdomains.com/management-and-passwords/findprovider/




The original domain provider denies responsibility.




There is a complaints and disputes procedure, but it doesn't look simple.



http://www.tucowsdomains.com/topic/disputes-and-complaints/




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System#Domain_name_registration



The organisation ICANN has the primary oversight of domain ownership on the internet, Tucows adhere to their lengthy dispute resolution protocols. But you aren't really disputing ownership - you and the original company agree who ought to own it, they are just being incompetent.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able