Skip to main content

linux - RH 7.2: Memory usage in ps and top don't match; problem or normal behavior?



When I use the "top" command on my Red Hat 7.2 machine, it tells me that ~3.9 out of 4.0 gigs of RAM are in use, and that there's about 135meg free.




When I use the "ps" command, however, to list all processes and their memory utilization, the list only adds up to about 650megs.



Is this expected behavior, or is there something going on that should be cause for concern? I read that Linux will use free RAM to cache frequently used files from the disk, could that account for the "missing" RAM utilization?



Thanks!
IVR Avenger


Answer



Your guess is most likely correct.



The "free memory" number given by top does not include what is used for the filesystem cache or buffers. The memory allocated to filesystem cache is free in that if an process needed some of it, it could easily be made available, but top will not show you this.




free -m


will give you a better idea of how much memory your processes are actually using (in MB), on the "-/+ buffers/cache" line.



Of course, it still won't likely equal your calculations based on the output of ps exactly, because calculating memory usage in Linux is tricky, especially around shared memory.



In the following example, 1287MB is much more accurate as a view of free memory than 31MB.



$ free -m

total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 2002 1970 31 0 48 1207
-/+ buffers/cache: 714 1287
Swap: 1027 3 1023

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able