Skip to main content

lamp - How much VPS ram would I need to run Wordpress, Apache, SVN & MySQL?





Does anyone have a ballpark figure of how much VPS ram (without burstable) I would need to have apache with wordpress and subversion as well as the MySQL instance?



Apache would host a couple of sites and SSL. MySQL would have just the Wordpress database. These sites are low traffic, less than 1k hits a day.


Answer



Take in mind that each apache worker will consume about 20-25MB, so if your 1k hits would be equally spaced in time in 8 hours per day you can think about having to serve only 0.03 requests per second.



Assuming you have all you traffic concentrated in only 1 hour in the day (it isn't of course), you should have to serve about 0.28 requests per second.




An other issue is how much memory got you DB, it is simple to know however, and it is quite a fixed cost.



In the worst case you will have to transfer the entire DB (oh my god!, refactor you SQL in this case! :) ) .. so double the previous number..



The short answer is (IMHO) 128MB will suffice, abundantly. You server will be idle and memory will be free for a long time, given the traffic you are imagine.



I have 20 domains into a VPS with 256 MB since 3 years, the are ok ... and the total hits are about 1500-2000 ...



OK, memory is cheap nowadays, but guys ... are you aware of how much is one gigabyte ?




PS:
I'm talking about a linux system of course, not about OS consuming 4GB for the gui only :)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able