Dell PERC 4/DC (PowerEdge 2850) and ZFS

I understand that ZFS prefers to have as much data about the drives as possible, and that the best thing to do is turn off RAID.

The hardware environment is a Dell PowerEdge 2850 with PERC 4/DC and four drives (73Gb each) installed out of six possible. The software is FreeNAS 8.0.2 with ZFS booting from USB key.

I've configured the RAID this way: each physical drive is a logical drive in a RAID 0. No special configurations were made beyond this.

Is this optimal for ZFS? How do I properly set this up under FreeNAS as a ZRAID? Do I want to?

In my reading it was said that one can't add a new disk to a ZRAID pool; is this still true? How would you go about adding two new disks in a redundant fashion to a zpool in FreeNAS?

Answer

No, this is not optimal for ZFS. This is outlined here on Server Fault at: ZFS SAS/SATA controller recommendations

The PERC 4/DC controller is a basic PCI-X parallel SCSI RAID controller. ZFS prefers to handle whole-disk management, so the better option in your case is to use a basic SCSI HBA. In lieu of that, the solution you've come up with by creating multiple RAID 0 logical drives will work. The only issue comes up when a drive fails. The replacement disk will need to be reinitialized as a RAID 0 logical drive in order to be recognized by ZFS. You will probably need a reboot in order to do this. It's something to consider.

Disk expansion is possible in certain cases. You can add vdevs (groupings of RAID disks) to a pool. For instance, if you have a zpool comprised of striped-mirrors (RAID 1+0), you can add additional mirrored pairs to that pool. You cannot expand a RAIDZ1/2/3 vdev.

Also see: ZFS: Mirror vs. RAID-Z and How can I add one disk to an existing raidz zpool?

Comments

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able

Blog

Search This Blog