Skip to main content

windows - SCCM Client Image deployment options




At my organization, we are using SCCM to manage OS deployments. Right now, it's rather complicated to get an image out to a client and I'm looking for an easier way. Here is what we have to do right now to get this to work:



We first have to gather the computer name and MAC adress so we can properly target the machine. All of the computers we want to reimage are added to a collection that has one required task. This task reboots the drive into a PXE environment, wipes the hard drive, and drops the OS onto the drive.



The problem with this is that when you add a computer to the collection, the process doesn't run until the next scheduled task check. This can take up to 30 minutes depending on when you add it to the collection. On top of that, there is no way to set a timer so techs have to wait until off hours to drop any images.



What's worse is that we don't have a way to manually kick off the image process. If we have a clean harddrive, we have a choice on how to proceed. We can use non-SCCM images to get an OS on it, install the SCCM client, and then reimage. We can also hunt for the MAC address for the computer (assmuning there is a label somewhere), and PXE boot it once we add it to the collection.



Do you have a headache? Cause I do. SCCM is managed my another department, and it's like pulling teeth to get any of our 500 computers reimaged. They even flat out told me that a first pass image run has an average success rate of %60.




There has got to be a better way to do this.


Answer



The SCCM client polling interval is a configurable setting that applies to all clients in the site. Sounds like it's set to 30 minutes at your site but (depending on network limitations/server load) this can be safely changed down to 15 minutes by someone with the appropriate SCCM site access.



There are ways to force a machine to check outside of its normal polling schedule.



There's an open source tool called SCCM Client Center that you can use to connect to a client machine and check/set a lot of the SCCM details with (as long as you have the appropriate permissions).



What you can do is once you've placed a machine in a collection, rather than waiting for it to poll you can connect to it using the Client Centre, select Client Actions -> Download Machine Policy, then wait a minute or two and select Client Actions -> Apply Machine Policy. This forces it to connect to the SCCM server collect any pending policy changes (eg new adverts) and then once they're downloaded you tell it to run them.




Setting a timer on the job running is down to whoever set up the advert for the job in the first place, they had a number of options they can pick for scheduling the job once it's picked up by a machine and presumably in this case picked "As soon as possible". You can also set up Maintenance Windows on machines that set when jobs can/can't be run on them which would stop builds happening in working hours if that's what you want, but it sounds like these parts are outside of your control unfortunately?



I could be mistaking how you're set up but normally once a machine's set up in SCCM you don't need to know it's MAC, and if you ever do you can just find the machine in the console right click it and look at it's details. Adding machines to a collection can be done by machine name, MAC, IP or pretty much any criteria, you only need to know one unique thing about it.



New 'bare metal' builds are obviously slightly different but we don't currently use that part of SCCM (but are planning to move over to it) so I can't tell you much there.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able