Skip to main content

raidz - ZFS mirror or RAID-Z for expandability




I'm building out a FreeNAS based server that will primarily be used to serve up iSCSI disks to Xen virtual machines and dedicated servers. My current data need is for 8TB of space, growing at about 2TB per year.
I have a Supermicro X6DHE-XB 3U enclosure with 4G of RAM, 16 SATA hot-swap bays that I will be using. It comes with 2x8 port 3Ware RAID cards, but I'm planning on just using the ZFS capabilities instead of the hardware RAID. My initial drive set will be 8x2TB HITACHI Deskstar 7K3000 HDS723020BLA642 drives.



I have 2 questions




  1. I will want to add additional drives to this server in the future and have them added to the storage pool. Ideally, I'd like to do this live without having to reboot or take the system off line. Are there any limitations or advantages to a ZFS mirror setup vs a RAID-Z setup for expanding the storage pool? With the hot-swap SATA ports, can I add a disk and have it show up in the FreeNAS GUI as available?

  2. If the performance penalty is less than 5% or so, I'd prefer to go with a RAID-Z2 setup so my initial volume size would be 12TB instead of 8TB with the mirrored config. This server will be pretty busy (serving up around 60 iSCSI targets), and unfortunately I have no way of testing it with a production load, besides putting it into production. I'd appreciate any real-world performance experience with RAID-Z serving large numbers of iSCSI targets.



Answer



Sorry I dont know anything about your hardware but If your OS and device can add the drives on the fly then ZFS will handle the disk additions and filesystem increase no problems. Infact it should be a very pleasing experience :-)



I do not know of any limitations with Mirror compaired to RAIDZ other than the usual mirror vs RAIDz conversations regarding space/redunancy and speed. Which ever you go for just give ZFS the indivdual disks and dont use the RAID , or if your not happy with that then maybe the second best options would be stripe to LUNS in your RAID and let ZFS mirror them ?



Your choice to let ZFS do the redundancy not your Hardware RAID seems to be the accepted method with ZFS if you dont have a mirror or RAIDZ in ZFS then you lose the filesystem self healing abilities that ZFS boasts about.



A old conversation can be found here. Its not the same type of hardware but its the same situation as yours
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/LmwutnAQ0OKwhALUNimw




Regards
Andy


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more