Skip to main content

domain name system - Why is Denic not accepting my nameservers?



I'm currently in the process of moving all of our domains to our own nameservers. Which wasn't an issue until I hit our own .de domain. I (think I) understand the implications of having the NS inside it's own domain, hence the need for glue records.



Until yesterday, I would have assumed I have a pretty good understanding of Bind and DNS zones until I was presented with this error from the Denic nameserver predelegation check:




Inconsistent set of nameserver IP addresses (NS, provided glues, determined glues)





  • ns2.hartwig-at.de

  • [88.198.242.190/88.198.242.190]

  • Default resolver determined: [], other resolvers determined: {88.198.242.190/88.198.242.190=[/2a01:4f8:d13:3c85:0:0:0:2, /88.198.242.190]}



Inconsistent set of nameserver IP addresses (NS, provided glues, determined glues)




  • ns1.hartwig-at.de


  • [cloud.hartwig-at.de/176.221.46.23]

  • Default resolver determined: [], other resolvers determined: {cloud.hartwig-at.de/176.221.46.23=[/2a00:1158:3:0:0:0:0:b6, /176.221.46.23]}




Screenshot of the result



The support of my registrar is either far better educated than me or doesn't have a clue. Either way, they're avoiding my questions in regards to what this error means. They just tell me





Your nameserver has to return your own nameservers as the default resolver.




But that doesn't make any sense to me and they refuse to try to explain it any other way.



This is the head of my current zone file:



@               86400   IN SOA          ns1.hartwig-at.de. hostmaster.hartwig-at.de. (
                                        2012070505 ; serial
                                        1d         ; refresh

                                        3h         ; retry
                                        4w         ; expiry
                                        1h )       ; minimum

                3600    IN NS           ns1.hartwig-at.de.
                3600    IN NS           ns2.hartwig-at.de.

                3600    IN MX 10        remote.hartwig-at.de.
                3600    IN MX 20        mx1.hartwig-at.de.
                3600    IN MX 30        mx2.hartwig-at.de.


localhost       3600    IN A            127.0.0.1
localhost       3600    IN AAAA         ::1
@               3600    IN A            176.221.46.23
                3600    IN AAAA         2a00:1158:3::b6
*               3600    IN A            176.221.46.23
                3600    IN AAAA         2a00:1158:3::b6

hetzner         3600    IN A            88.198.242.190
hetzner         3600    IN AAAA         2a01:4f8:d13:3c85::2

cloud           3600    IN A            176.221.46.23
cloud           3600    IN AAAA         2a00:1158:3::b6

; List all NS as A/AAAA record
ns              3600    IN A            176.221.46.23
ns              3600    IN AAAA         2a00:1158:3::b6
ns1             3600    IN A            176.221.46.23
ns1             3600    IN AAAA         2a00:1158:3::b6
ns2             3600    IN A            88.198.242.190
ns2             3600    IN AAAA         2a01:4f8:d13:3c85::2



So, what is the problem with my zone? And what is the "default resolver"?


Answer



Your nameservers have AAAA records, but you didn't include the IPv6 addresses as glue records (hence the glue records are not consistent with the addresses returned by your nameserver). Running the check with both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses listed returns the following:



DEnic nameserver check


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more