Skip to main content

windows server 2008 - Suddenly Gmail and Hotmail block our emails





Starting from yesterday, all emails sent from our server are being rejected by Gmail and Hotmail.



Everything was working properly until now.



Here are the error messages received:




Gmail



Failed Recipient: email@gmail.com
Reason: Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 [server IP 1] Our system has detected an unusual rate of
5.7.1 unsolicited mail originating from your IP address. To protect our
5.7.1 users from spam, mail sent from your IP address has been blocked.
5.7.1 Please visit http://www.google.com/mail/help/bulk_mail.html to review
5.7.1 our Bulk Email Senders Guidelines. el7si1434447wib.69 - gsmtp



Hotmail



Failed Recipient:address@hotmail.com
Reason: Remote host said: 421 RP-001 (BAY0-MC3-F30) Unfortunately, some messages from [server IP] weren't sent. Please try again. We have limits for how many messages can be sent per hour and per day. You can also refer to http://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx#errors.


I do know the point of those messages - they both blocked our server because it might be sending out spam.



However, I don't understand what exactly could have caused this.





  • Was someone spamming Gmail/Hotmail addresses from our server?

  • Did some of the recipients report our emails as spam?

  • Any other possibilities?



I'm honestly not sure where to look at first.



Thanks!



Answer



First of all check if your IP adress is listed in any blacklist - here, for example



Also, by the Hotmail response, it seems like one of computers in your network has virus sending spam. You can try to determine which one by monitoring your mail server (strange messages with lots of recepients, blank "from" field and so on) or by simply doing antivirus scan on all your computers. Also dont forget to change passwords for that user


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able