Skip to main content

virtualization - virtual san appliance in esxi? why?



I am looking at different SAN solutions (Starwind, Lefthand, OpenFiler, OpenSolaris, etc.) for my small office and I understand that there are many virtual SAN appliance (VSA) solutions which can be used with ESXi.



Does anyone use it in a mission critical environment?




Let's see if I got it right:



In order for the SAN VM to "see" the harddisks, ESXi would have to "see" it first right? I'm assuming you would have to install the SAN VM on a local datastore, AND allocate space on a local datastore for the SAN VM, something like this:




  • USB boot ESXi

  • RAID card with local disk array A (For OS)

  • RAID card with local disk array B (For SAN)

  • Install SAN VM on local disk array A

  • Use local disk array B as SAN datastore


  • Share SAN datasore with other ESXi machines



Are there advantages to this kind of setup? It seems a little overcomplicated to set it up this way, isn't it? How does this support HA?


Answer




Does anyone use it in a mission critical environment?




I'm sure some do yes.





In order for the SAN VM to "see" the harddisks, ESXi would have to
"see" it first right?




Correct.



You're generally right about the start-up sequence although in most cases it'd actually be more like;





  • Boot ESXi from local hard disk/array

  • Auto-start Storage VM from local disk datastore

  • Storage VM then shares out local disk datastore using iSCSI/NFS etc. to any ESXi host.

  • Any of the ESXi hosts can then start any VMs contained in shared storage.



The advantages of this approach is that it's very cheap, local DAS is always going tobe cheaper than centralised resilient SAN arrays. Some storage VMs also cluster to offer a sort of 'RAID of VMs' to increase resilience.



Personally for MC work I would use centralised SAN arrays but I have the budget, others don't and some of these storage VM systems can be configured to be surprisingly fast and resilient.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able