Skip to main content

split dns - How can I access a server on local network using its public name?



I have a problem in which I cannot access a server using its public name from the same network as the server. Access to the server works fine from the internet.



Reading up on this problem, I've ran across such things as hairpin NAT, loopback NAT, split DNS, editing hosts files, etc.



My network has a SMC 8013WG-CCR (Comcast) cable modem connected to a Linksys WRT54G2. As I understand, the router is supposed to handle this sort of loopback (by leaving the security option "Filter Internet NAT Redirection" disabled), but the connection between these two devices is a secondary LAN, so I don't think the router "knows" what the proper public IP address is.



The easiest solution would be to edit the hosts files of all the computers in the network, but many are notebook computers which will need to access the server both on the LAN and externally.




The server is Windows Server 2012, so I could set it up as the internal DNS server but I don't have enough experience with this to really understand how it would interact with the router, DHCP, etc.



I am prepared to purchase a new router if I need something with greater capability. It appears from my research that most IT admins prefer to solve this problem with split DNS rather than hairpin NAT. I understand the concept of hairpin NAT more clearly than split DNS. It seems to me that the router just needs to provide LAN clients with the local IP of the server when clients use the public name (sub.domain.com). Isn't that just an entry in a local DNS cache? Is that what split DNS does?



What would be a good solution to implement this fix for a small business?


Answer



Split DNS is the least painful if your Gateway/Firewall does not allow loopback/hairpin access. This requires that you set your internal DNS server to be the primary lookup for all internal hosts and configure it to have a "copy" of the public domain records, with the respective internal IP addresses replacing external/public IPs.



The drawback to Split DNS is that it requires you to maintain two sets of records for the public domain.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more