Skip to main content

linux - Apache Server files in /var/www/



All right... I have my server set up and I have 4 sites residing in /var/www/. Each site directory and the files underneath it are all root:www-pub according to this post:



What's the best way of handling permissions for Apache 2's user www-data in /var/www?




My user, cdog, is part of the www-pub, as directed by the above post and, after more research, I believe umask is set up properly.



Issues 1: Creating new files inside any of the /var/www/ directories gives me permissions



cdog:www-pub -rw-r--r--


all other files are




root:www-pub -rw-rw-r--


I was led to believe (according to above post) that any new files created would be the later.



Issue 2 Most of these directories, with permissions of



drwxrwsr-x



are Joomla directories. Logging into the Joomla back end gives me a whole bunch of unwritable directories, which isn't good for updating/installing extensions/plugins, etc.



First, why aren't my files being created with the correct permissions?
Second, why are the Joomla directories not writable?


Answer



The user's umask determines what permissions new files receive. When a file or directory is created the systems starts with the most permissive permissions (0666 and 0777 respectively), and then clears the bits specified in the umask. The default umask of 022 therefore causes the group and world write bits to be cleared, which is why you end up with 0644.



To create files with group write permission you need to change the umask to 002 (i.e. only clear the world write permission). This can be done in a specific shell session with umask 002, but this won't persist across sessions.



There are a number of ways to set the umask permanently. If the pam_umask PAM module is installed and configured, you can set this in /etc/login.defs:




UMASK   002


Otherwise you can set it in your shell initialisation scripts, either ~/.bashrc if you only want it to apply to your user, or /etc/bash.bashrc if you want it to apply to all users:



umask 002

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able