Poor Disk Performance on VMs; Host using PERC H310 RAID 5

I have a Dell R620 running 5 500GB 7.2K RPM SATA 3Gbps 2.5in Hot-plug Hard Drives in a PERC H310 controller (which I am beginning to regret buying).

I am getting awful read/write speeds on Linux VMs (Fedora 19, Cent 6 and Ubuntu 12.04) running ESXi 5.0 free license. Using Thin, Thick or Sparse VMDKs don't make a difference.

An example hdparm:

cached reads 9750 MB in 2.00 seconds = 4877.74 MB/sec
buffered reads: 42 MB in 3.44 seconds = 12.21 MB/sec

Also a dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1048576 count=2048 (to create an arbitrary 2GB file) took about a minute and a half!

I have a very similar host with a software RAID controller that has similar VMs which are much faster in disk speeds. I didn't set up the RAID, I only manage the server, but IT sets them up.

The Datastore shows an average 1.189 millisecond latency for reads and a 6.3 millisecond latency for writes. The datastore shows 1.89 TB so that is about correct for 5 x 500 GB drives in a RAID 5. Initially I was thinking maybe it isn't using all of the drives. What could be going on? I have asked IT to take a look at the RAID BIOS and see if there are some diagnostics we can run.

UPDATE
I realized the one faster host has 10K RPM disks and the newer one has 7.2K

UPDATE 2

Is it possible that ESXi being run off of a SD card is causing performance to lag for disk operations within VMs?

Comments

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able

Blog

Search This Blog