Skip to main content

domain name system - Mailgun mails bouncing, possible DNS records are wrong?

itemprop="text">


This has probably been
asked and answered before, but I'm a bit lost because I don't know what's happening and
therefor don't know what to look for. I would not only like a solution of course, but I
would also like to understand what's happening. I have a technical background, but in
software development. Servers, DNS records, etc is a bit new to me (although I've
managed).



I'm running a web application on
shared hosting. I have access to a Plesk control panel (I believe 12.5). The domain name
is registered at another company. And for sending mails, I'm using Mailgun (calling
their API).



Now, some mails bounce (others
don't), with messages
like:




  • Sender address
    rejected: Domain not found

  • sorry, your domain does not
    exists.




When I
use MXToolbox, an href="https://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=mx%3apeergroups.be&run=toolpage"
rel="nofollow noreferrer">MX Lookup looks fine. But when I test the email
server (with MXToolbox), I see the following
messages:




  • Reverse DNS does
    not match SMTP Banner

  • Warning - Does not support
    TLS



I don't think the
second is a problem (?), but the first one might be? When I do a check for SPF I
see:





  • DNS Record
    not found



Should I fix
this? (I've heard about SPF in mail contexts) href="https://serverfault.com/questions/591046/why-does-the-mxtoolbox-spf-record-checker-not-like-my-spf-record">This
question seems to suggest I should add an SPF record, but I currently can't in
Plesk 12.5.



On the other hand, Mailgun itself
says everything is fine (apart from the records but as I read it, they're not important
for sending mails?):
rel="nofollow noreferrer"> alt="Mailgun DNS">



So what's going
on here? And how can I fix it, or what should I know to dig
deeper?




Update



The
domain this is happening on is peergroups.be



An
example of headers of a mail that was
received:




Delivered-To:
peter.morlion@gmail.com
Received: by 10.100.161.143 with SMTP id
q15csp289063pjc;

Wed, 24 May 2017 04:10:04 -0700
(PDT)
X-Received: by 10.98.93.217 with SMTP id
n86mr37944933pfj.113.1495624203335;
Wed, 24 May 2017 04:10:03 -0700
(PDT)
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com:
domain of bounce+3c1c7e.55be3c-no-reply=peergroups.be@mg.peergroups.be designates
198.61.254.51 as permitted sender)
smtp.mailfrom=bounce+3c1c7e.55be3c-no-reply=peergroups.be@mg.peergroups.be;

dkim=pass header.i=@mg.peergroups.be
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of
bounce+3c1c7e.55be3c-no-reply=peergroups.be@mg.peergroups.be designates 198.61.254.51 as
permitted sender) client-ip=198.61.254.51;
Received: by 10.99.134.67 with POP3
id x64mf19905540pgd.0;
Wed, 24 May 2017 04:10:02 -0700
(PDT)
X-Gmail-Fetch-Info: no-reply@peergroups.be 4 peergroups.be 110
no-reply@peergroups.be

DomainKey-Status: good
Received:
from so254-51.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.51]) by home with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 24 May
2017 06:15:04 -0400
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=mg.peergroups.be; q=dns/txt; s=pic; t=1495620904; h=Content-Type: Mime-Version:
Subject: From: To: Message-Id: Date: Sender;
bh=60eeErLSy3DUfbYC4arXt0KAzdkuCC532GBme+wUcGk=;
b=ky0zW94QsXQqkl8LFf+S0YI87ltc92JRKbl4sxN2HKe6ZJwsBBfIJMr5IQGg+LVBCxb0wt3b
jcAVWRGFzHVXmIk/y5Ejphp1LwrkKKg62rocD6Jx4ZZFLsDiTMaXa3k108wnEhQuK4vbiEZP
QUtpRzdcoaYC5AtFzoaQ9PYPU6g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=mg.peergroups.be; s=pic; q=dns; h=Sender: Date: Message-Id: To: From: Subject:
Mime-Version: Content-Type;
b=O0C2WmpWCejy1cmQF1zc8spQo3zdEe7EV14Niynve2ilpUBguylHYU/muTCkD+n6saCKjK
fvyjkBsvkxI6r2dA1myRBq8RQ9jZjgFxPjG6QgVSw9xObYz69QssRGrEAIZonOUMjoTzqrbd
uDAM11KpxXB488y9NzH8LmzaXTAig=
Sender:
no-reply=peergroups.be@mg.peergroups.be
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 10:15:04
+0000
X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.51
X-Mailgun-Sid:
WyIxMjkwYSIsICJuby1yZXBseUBwZWVyZ3JvdXBzLmJlIiwgIjU1YmUzYyJd
Received: by
luna.mailgun.net with HTTP; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:15:03 +0000
Message-Id:
<20170524101503.72580.5AE8265694D87481@mg.peergroups.be>

To:
no-reply@peergroups.be
From: Peergroups

Subject: Some subject
here
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="c9281a23246040cfb8a7081ab45d40f5"
Return-Path:



Answer




It seems I made a small mistake where I added the MX records for mailgun using
the peergroups.be domain, but Mailgun was using
mg.peergroups.be Adding MX records for
mg.peergroups.be solved it. This also became apparent in the
Mailgun dashboard, where the orange warning signs you see in the screenshot above became
green checkmarks.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able