Skip to main content

New Mac OS X Server setup, when i send mail to gmail it goes straight to Spam. Why is that?

New Mac OS X Server setup, when i send mail to gmail it goes straight to Spam. Why is that?



My setup:
DNS - done (A records PTR are ok)
Mail Setup - done
Webmail - done



Also there seems to be a naming problem. They all come from me@server.domain.com instead of me@domain.com. I must be missing an alias somewhere.



I've read an entire book on setting this up so don't throw stones :)

The GUI is masking a lot of this up for me, so explanations via GUI are appreciated.






The headers look like this:



Delivered-To: MYACCOUNT@gmail.com



Received: by 10.142.252.19 with SMTP id z19cs476033wfh;




    Mon, 3 Jan 2011 01:37:09 -0800 (PST)


Received: by 10.204.64.208 with SMTP id f16mr8853543bki.61.1294047428115;



    Mon, 03 Jan 2011 01:37:08 -0800 (PST)


Return-Path:




Received: from server.DOMAIN.com ([94.x.x.x])



    by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c20si50831332bkc.48.2011.01.03.01.37.07;

Mon, 03 Jan 2011 01:37:07 -0800 (PST)


Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 94.x.x.x is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of USER@www.DOMAIN.com) client-ip=94.x.x.x;



Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 94.x.x.x is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of USER@www.DOMAIN.com) smtp.mail=USER@www.DOMAIN.com




Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])



by server.DOMAIN.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A19F60508;

Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:37:07 +0200 (EET)


X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at DOMAIN.com




Received: from server.DOMAIN.com ([127.0.0.1])



by localhost (server.DOMAIN.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)

with ESMTP id mNgNTNwNhyP1; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:37:06 +0200 (EET)


Received: from www.DOMAIN.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])



by server.DOMAIN.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E69604F1;


Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:37:06 +0200 (EET)


Received: from 10.0.1.3



    (SquirrelMail authenticated user USER)

by www.DOMAIN.com with HTTP;


Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:37:06 +0200


Message-ID:



Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:37:06 +0200



Subject: test



From: USER@www.DOMAIN.com




To: MYACCOUNT@gmail.com



User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20



MIME-Version: 1.0



Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1



Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit




X-Priority: 3 (Normal)



Importance: Normal



test

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...